Tariffs Damage Industry Competitiveness

Tariffs are historically proven to reduce economic competitiveness, hinder innovation and increase manufacturing costs.

Section 232 and 301 tariffs will disrupt industry supply chains, resulting in increased costs and inefficiencies.

Retaliatory measures may dissuade importers from purchasing U.S. petroleum equipment and products, harming service companies and their employees.

BACKGROUND
PESA members source certain parts used in the manufacturing process of larger end products from qualified foreign suppliers. Many of the products are not currently produced in the United States and have not been produced here for many years. While PESA members would prefer to source from an entirely domestic supply chain, often this is simply not possible or practical.

PESA members generally do not support tariffs as a solution to rectify trade imbalances. Historically, tariffs have been proven to reduce economic competitiveness and increase manufacturing costs. PESA will continue to advocate for an alternative strategy to rectify trade imbalances, one that combines stakeholder input with forward-thinking analysis to secure our industry’s future.

PESA’S POSITION
PESA supports a balanced approach to tariffs and trade that both addresses illicit practices and considers economic implications for U.S. businesses. Such an approach is achievable with stakeholder input and deliberative policymaking. PESA works to curb unfair trade practices and to equalize the $32 billion a month trade gap between China and the United States. Forced technology transfers and commercial espionage are common in China, and some PESA members have faced negative consequences from these actions.

However, PESA believes that many tariffs will not necessarily curb China’s unfair trade practices, and instead could unintentionally harm the energy manufacturing and service sectors, areas where the US currently enjoys worldwide dominance.

The imposition of tariffs on Chinese imports used in the manufacturing process in the United States will increase the cost of these products. This increase would have to be passed on down the line. PESA fears that this would further expose our domestic manufacturers to foreign competition as competitors will surely use this opportunity to their advantage. While PESA members would welcome U.S. manufacturing to fill the void so they would not have to source from China, the reality is that due to the complex and highly technical manufacturing processes it could take many years for some of the products to be produced domestically. Some products may never be. The industry is also highly regulated, and supply chain disruptions could cause significant delays as new parts may have to be certified to ensure compliance with regulations.

This scenario could ultimately provide foreign manufacturers of final products a competitive advantage over U.S. manufacturers. PESA fears that the imposition of across the board tariffs does not adequately account for the role of the global supply chain in complex energy manufacturing. These multifaceted supply chains have grown over time in the energy manufacturing sector, taking years to establish, and cannot be shifted to different countries or facilities without significant long-term disruptions. Supply chain disruptions will cause increased production costs and shortages which will expose our companies to increased competition from foreign competitors who do not face such challenges. This scenario may cause the unintended consequence of hurting U.S. manufacturers significantly while inflicting little damage on the Chinese economy.

PESA ACTIONS

• USTR Formally Announces Section 301 List 3 Exclusion Process
• PESA Testimony Regarding Proposed 301 Tariffs Modification
• PESA Joins More Than 600 Companies, Associations Urging Resolution to China Trade Dispute
• Two Oilfield Tariff Exclusions Granted by USTR
• PESA Actions on New Round of Section 301 Tariffs
• PESA Opposes Imposition of New 25% Tariff on Certain Imports into U.S. from China
• Trump Administration Delays Implementation of Section 301 Tariffs
• Spending Bill Includes Directives to USTR on the Tariffs Exclusion Process
• PESA Opposes Imposition of New 25% Tariff on Certain Imports into U.S. from China
• PESA Co-Hosts “Tariffs Hurt the Heartland” Town Hall in Houston
• New Data Reveals Massive Tariff Costs for Lone Star State
• PESA Files 301 Product Exclusion Requests with USTR on Behalf of Member Companies
• PESA Works with Member Companies on 301 Exclusion Process
• PESA to Submit 301 Product Exclusion Requests On Behalf of Members
• PESA Testifies Against New Tariffs at the USTR Section 301 Committee
• U.S. Imposes Tariffs on $34 Billion of Chinese Goods